Case Study: Parallel Processing
by TheeMahn on Oct.06, 2020, under How to, Linux, Programming, Server, Themes, Ultimate Edition
This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.
Monday, November 2, 2020
Sunday, November 1, 2020
Ultimate Edition
Case Study: Parallel Processing
by TheeMahn on Oct.06, 2020, under How to, Linux, Programming, Server, Themes, Ultimate Edition
Our computers did the leg work so you do not have to. I do have
other computers if I need further data. Feel free to post your results
as well, I did spend a chunk of my life writing the software and
testing. I will not rob you of system info (minus mac addresses). Both are nasty computers.
I wrote an application uetheme a sub-application of tmosb (TheeMahn’s Operating System Builder) to take advantage of multi-core / multi-threaded Central Processing Unit(s) (CPU), you will also need Repostorm
installed if you intend to do your own testing. It will build each of
the 150 deb(s) perfectly. I will point that out later. Results are here, software is still advancing.
I
intended and succeeded to demonstrate what a massive difference in
speed and time such a technology makes, when this approach is mastered.
You do not have to go through what I did to see the difference:uetheme --benchmark
# Launches 1 CPU thread, 2, 3.. until you run out of CPU threads &
records results for each thread. (Will take a long time, read on) How
99%+ software is written.
I would not suggest doing the above command. The application will download ~1/2GB of theme source code data,
extract it, start a timer and begin building. It took a AMD Ryzen 9
3950X 16 Core 32 thread CPU 4 hours, 40 minutes and 53 seconds to
complete (32 times built). Critical data was gathered during the
process to make the chart above, the same was also launched on a AMD
Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core / 24 thread CPU also gathering data 3 hours 40
minutes and 36 seconds (24 times, not 32 times).
For Example: an
AMD Epyc 64 core / 128 Thread would do it 128 times (perhaps take
longer), creating a point of data & would totally demolish the data I
provided above.
I am also providing a spreadsheet of the results in ods format (Libre Office) & pdf format (Adobe Acrobat).
If you want to test it yourself. I would suggest manually (open a terminal):uetheme --benchmark # Let one thread finish will report:
| Timer: 0h54m9s (3249 seconds) for example. Painful was it not? |
(Press CTRL+C) to cancel it will return you to the folder you executed it in.cd themes/
# Automatically will detect the number of CPU core(s) / Thread(s) you
have & use them all. (will build 150 deb packages – 1.3 GB in size
total)
uetheme --clean # erases build files
uetheme --all
| Timer: 0h4m00s (240 seconds) 13.5375 times as fast. Results will vary depending on the CPU used. |
Observations
While the Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core / 24 thread CPU initially laid the
smack down on the Ryzen 3950X 16 core / 32 thread, the AMD 3950X did
eventually beat the 12 core & the 12 core had an extreme advantage.
I swear I did tell you about that,
12 days uptime did not bother you or the Terabytes of space? The 12
Core is running Ultimate Edition 6.6 Server (No GUI) – minimal
applications running in the background. The 16 Core was running
Ultimate Edition 6.7 Developer and many applications running in the
foreground, so a margin for error does exist, it is very minimal &
weighs heavier to the 3950X opening that gap for the positive (better
results for the 3950X).
Reasons for the observation?
Different load as explained above & different base clocks both are 7nm technology.
Disk
I/O activity is not considered both are running off Non-Volatile Memory
Expansion (NVME) drives & both have identical memory, both have 20
Gigabit Ethernet (timer does not start until after the download
finishes) therefore network speed is not a part of the calculation /
equation.
Results in my case are not scalar.
The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16 core / 32 thread CPU is NOT 32 times as fast as a single core / thread: 13.5375 times as fast.
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12 Core / 24 Thread: 11.6774193548387 times as fast.
Feel
free to test my thesis / case study & report your own case study.
Enjoy faster software inbound. That part is a fact. I only have a quad
core TheeMahn? Did you see the difference between 1 and 2 threads?
99% of software is written to take care of a single core. I am going to
change that. Move yourself up that list to 4 cores (oh, I have 4 cores
and 8 threads) do you see where I am going?
I almost forgot to
tell you: I do not care if you have an Intel CPU. Results will be the
similar. Ghz did the 12 core justice in single core, what Intel does
best currently. That gap will broaden, Intel will go down. I am sorry
Intel fans. Intel does not make a 64 core / 128 thread CPU. Glad to be
a cutting edge programmer. Did you see the chart I provided above?
The application is indiscriminate.
Multi-core processing is now in:
Repostorm
Roku-Ripper (Limited to 16 cores – complain to ffmpeg devs)
Blow off steam TheeMahn
You
are welcome for faster software (Intel or AMD should not matter), I
spent a long time writing the software, and recording the results. Am I
missing Intel from the results? If I insert them it would look all
bad. I own an Intel / NVidia ASUS ROG (Republic Of Gamers) Laptop. An 4
core / 8 thread (7700HQ) CPU. Please tell me it would get it done in 4
minutes? I doubt even an hour & also has 16GB of ram and NVME
technology. Yes, a Laptop. Send me a 9900 (K)eep (S)pending chip I
will dust it, Intel does have faster today, nothing to even think about
touching me.
No pun intended, Intel will struggle to touch AMD
3950X, the Server world they are screwed & that is a fact. That is a
desktop CPU v/s their top server CPU. AMD has them and by the short
and curlies & faster is coming.
I won’t buy one it has a lower “base clock” then the 3950X. Right
now, software is not geared to take advantage of multiple cores /
threads. I intend to change that once again.
If I get the
opportunity I will test it, the wife has both of my laptops. Both have
NVME technology. Both have Intel technology. The Yoga is also no joke
has a 4K touchscreen.
My rigs will spin rings around both. Do
you want to see where Intel falls in? You are screwed, that is the last
thing they wanted to provide their users, more cores unheard of. I
want to keep raping our users we have no competition, that is long gone.
Nvidia
likes to think they are in “The Cool Zone”, congratulations for now.
AMD will hand you your ass too. When NVidia seen AMD hand Intel it’s
ass. NVidia Stepped up it’s game, the first time in many a year. In
the end NVidia will lose. I am not just a programmer.
This is a pill you will be unable to swallow (if you are an NVidia Fella):
in
the GPU arena (NVidia / AMD) That is Billions of dollars, AMD is going
to take NVidia down, not with your 3090x, but raw power. What does
your next Xbox have in it? How about your Playstation 5? I am not
letting you off the hook how about your next cellphone Samsung is
licensing from AMD?
NVidia please show me your sales next
quarter, real competition is coming, did you blow off Intel’s loss as
fruitless? I have been waiting to fill my pockets. Blow everything I
said off, that will soon be the standard.
In the server market
you are truly screwed. HBM2e will ensure that, who developed that
technology as you tried DDR6? When you play with servers we do not care
about money right?
Try once to Innovate, just once NVidia. I
think I did a pretty good job, feel free to correct me. Nvidia attempts
to buy ARM to be competitive to AMD, AMD rolls to be the worst thing
you have seen $50 Billion purchase. We don’t have to worry about buying
that technology. It is not like AMD is not doing the same, a real thorn to NVidia if it goes through & Intel for that matter.
TheeMahn
| P.S. Did you know
AMD patented project Quantum computing second time, w/o a doubt they
mean business. AMD has the resources now. You are both screwed.
Funny, I did not get in it for the money. I will absorb it. $6.97 a
share in & hanging tight, what is it now? $85.35 +0.99 (1.17%),
that is just today. I could just bail out & pay off my house. It is not done, I am not going anywhere. AMD Stock is going no-where but up. Don’t blame my software. |
WordPress Amazing?
by TheeMahn on Oct.30, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
They Automatically upgrade my websites. Sounds great does it not? We have multiple sites.
Since
WordPress 5.2 there is a built-in feature that detects when a plugin or
theme causes a fatal error on your site, and notifies you with this
automated email.
In this case, WordPress caught an error with one of your plugins,
Advanced User Agent Displayer. Thanks for telling me 11 months later (a
few minutes ago). Do I have time to roll through my Email – Millions
unread at least they caught it, turned it off and guess what they were
right. My job is to program not write php etc. At least they caught
it, you can now comment all 160,004 registered users, just this site.
Millions overall. I do my job, start doing yours.
I will tell
you what you do not know. I have been building Operating Systems all
day. A single flaw rm -R * start over, re-write the software. I am
looking for perfection. Rebuild.
I am curious, how many Millions of downloads? Do the math on that at 4.4 Gigabytes for example. We move data up in here.
TheeMahn,
Not perfect, but close.
by TheeMahn on Oct.16, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
I installed Ultimate Edition 6.7 Developer now twice. I am thinking
my daily driver, I am a developer. This is a LTS (Long Term Supported)
release, I will let you know I have re-built it. I want you to enjoy it
with me if you are a developer. A common user, I do not suggest it.
You will find very few games, yes there are a few. Heavily strewn with
applications to develop. We will move forward. I like to think of this
as my base.
I do have a tighter one coming: 2098167 extents written (4,097 MB), let me do my job. I canceled it.
19%
818MB 227.6KB/s 4:12:52 ETA I won’t deal with that, uploading to our
servers. 13 minutes v/s 4 hours… Once on our servers I can pass it
around in a minute, multiple servers. 1% 65MB 1.1MB/s 1:04:47 ETA
Should have left it alone. Sourceforge Hammered? Something new drop
today? My internet is faster then SourceForge today.
You do not get it today. I will let it go: 55% 2327MB 1.4MB/s 22:08 ETA
I usually see 117MB a sec downloading (you already know where it is at):
2020-10-16 12:54:27 (56.8 MB/s) – ‘ultimate-edition-6.7-x64-developer-kde.iso’ saved [4393695232/4393695232]
Bandwidth suckers!!! Be glad that is not a server based Operating System I am writing.
It does now exist (66MB/s) is what I see from SourceForge now (currently 14 mirrors):
Sorry Gambas3 was broken at time of build (the following will fix it):
sudo apt-get install gambas3-gb-form-print
Now, you understand why I pull out my hair and why I am bald, lol.
TheeMahn,
Parallel processing?
by TheeMahn on Oct.01, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
There is no-body that will provide you what I am going to show you. I
can promise you I have software in works. I highly doubt anyone
understands what that is.
I have a 32 core my main rig, 24 core
handed my my ass. We will dig into it. That is the beautiful thing. I
have software in works. I am writing software to take advantage of
your computer.
READY?
Lets start out with TMOSB:
Got to have Repostorm too.
Crack open a terminal (this is when you start to understand):
uetheme –benchmark
Results are fanatical (STARTED AT ONE CORE AND ROLLED TO 32):
Perfect debs built this session: in /home/sledgehammer/themes
Timer: 0h4m8s (248 seconds)
I highly doubt you did anything I told you to do & should do anything I say.
We are discussing Parallel processing I write software to take advantage of that. You are about to find about. Like it or not.
Even my admin do know know this:
uetheme –all threads=(X insert treads here)
TheeMahn,
Welcome to the Enterprise.
by TheeMahn on Sep.25, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
I have started buying Enterprise level drives to replace what I will
call crap. If a 8TB drive can not last a year (3 failed in a year)? I
only bought 2 X 12TB drives, they are slow writing. Reading roughly 4
or 500 MB/s a second. Eventually. It will be in a raid array of 8 X
12TB, raid 0. Gigs per second. They are warranted backed for 5 years.
Google for example would buy one of them. They are not cheap. Built
to last.
I will start utilizing data flow. This is what I want
you to think about when I lost 48TB of data, I re-filled it. I am ahead
of the game.
The wife just informed me, even though I try to not
get money, she informed me I have a Google check deposited. Funny, my
check and hers also deposited in one day. I worked a holiday, my taxes
were almost $600. I worked for what? Let me fill your govt pockets.
If $600 is taxes, that would make me wonder how much I actually made.
TheeMahn,
2 in one day?
by TheeMahn on Sep.15, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
Built 2 Operating systems in one day. Believe you me it would be much higher if I did not have other things to do. I went over to my buddy’s house and installed a Security System. 3 Operating Systems in one day was my record in the past 2 sound better now?
Let’s see what I infer:
Ultimate Edition 6.6 Server LTS
You do know I went back and re-wrote software & wrote a Developer Edition? The Developer Edition is more advanced & that happened all in one day. I am about to take a week’s vacation. Can you imagine the impact I will soon have. I will let you know also in that 24 hour period: I re-wrote Conky-builder, TMOSB (TheeMahn’s Operating System Builder), Uno (Ultimate Network Optimizer) & Nasup. No work in RepoStorm yet.
You get the builder working right, all falls in place. I want to pat myself in the back… FTP (File Trasfer Protocol) works off the snap, Apache2, SSH. It is probably faster to say what does not work on the server side.
Minidlna does not work with-out intervention.
Yes, one guy can do that. You Guys wonder why I want to buy 8 X 12 TB drives? I have well over 100 TB of space & is not cutting it. I mean adding 100 TB of space. Don’t worry I will pay for it. I do math quite well I wrote an application called Raid calculator you have not seen yet. That is 96 TB, close enough. I will you know I have lost 2 Seagate 8TB drives. I am moving to Western Digital. How old do you think they were? They are 8 TB per drive. Less then a year, Junk. Do you think I care to send them back? Ultimately, they cost me 48TB of data. I am glad I had that backed up.
When you play with that kind of space it really makes you think. I Uploaded at 1.1 GB (10 Gigiabit Fiber) a second to replace the data lost. How long do you think it took? The answer is 3 days. Even with Uno in place on both rigs.
TheeMahn
Software at its finest.
by TheeMahn on Sep.10, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
200,000 Registered members seems minuscule. That will go away into the Millions.
Ready to work with me?
The Quest for speed…
I want to demonstrate the software I have in works. First look at specs of 2 different computers utilized in the test.
Main Rig:
theemahn@JackHammer:~$
inxi CPU: 16-Core (2-Die) AMD Ryzen 9 3950X (-MT MCP MCM-)
speed/min/max: 2196/2200/3500 MHz Kernel: 5.8.5-050805-generic x86_64
Up: 2h 54m Mem: 4656.2/15977.1 MiB (29.1%) Storage: 27.52 TiB (87.4%
used) Procs: 558 Shell: bash 5.0.17 inxi: 3.0.38
Server (Storage):
storage@storage:/media/40TB/themes$
inxi CPU: 12-Core AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (-MT MCP-) speed/min/max:
2196/2200/3800 MHz Kernel: 5.4.0-40-generic x86_64 Up: 18m Mem:
1829.8/15988.0 MiB (11.4%) Storage: 62.55 TiB (71.7% used) Procs: 415
Shell: bash 5.0.17 inxi: 3.0.38
Kernels are most certainly different, don’t worry I will build a
“Edge” Server. Both are on dual 10 Gigabit networking. The server has 5 X
8TB drives in Raid 0 (actually 6 one has failed going to replace them
Friday) & 2 X 10TB drives also in raid 0. No slouch in data transfer
speed. Both are insanely fast computers, both have NVME’s PCIE 4.0.
I
just want to demonstrate the difference CPU cores make when software is
written to take advantage of CPU resources. Using a single CPU core as
most software is written takes 1 Hour and 10 minutes to do what I am
about to show you the difference in software development & CPU
cores. Today, it is almost impossible to find a single core CPU, however
almost all software is written with a single CPU core in mind.
I am going to change that at least in Linux (Ultimate Edition).
Results?
Single core usage: 1 Hour 10 minutes
16 Core / 32 thread (AMD 3950X): 0h4m1s
12 Core / 24 thread (AMD 3900X): 0h10m3s
Can
you imagine if all software was written with that in mind? Do you think
I am Bullshitting you? Want to test what I have written? Download every
theme I have written (Ultimate Edition 2.0 to 6.9) in source compressed
format themes.tar.gz (almost 500MB) Want to test me?
Crack Open a terminal:
wget http://os-builder.com/themes/themes.tar.gz
wget http://os-builder.com/UETOYS/ultimate-edition-os-builder_2.0.5_all.deb
wget http://os-builder.com/UETOYS/ultimate-edition-repostorm_2.0.4_all.deb
sudo dpkg -i ultimate-edition* #Once all is installed. Let’s extract that 1/2 a GB archive
mkdir -p themes
mv themes.tar.gz themes/
cd themes/
tar xfv themes.tar.gz
Ready to witness what I said?
Type or copy paste the following command in the terminal: uetheme -a #all themes
Launching thread #32: Populating Ultimate Edition Theme: 5.7 (RUNNING
INSTANCES: 31)
What happens if you hit CTRL-C:
** Trapped CTRL-C, exiting.
Killing all 41 instances of uetheme. How did it exceed 32?
It will launch the number of CPU cores you have available building
themes utilizing the number of CPU cores you have available
simultaneously. That is where software is heading from here forward on
my end. It will probably take a long time to build, unless you have a
fast computer, no matter what you have still faster then it would take
as a single core CPU.
As Darth Vadar would say: Impressive, most impressive.
Do you have a 32 core / 64 thread Threadripper? Or an Epyc? I would love to see those results.
Want to install them themes? It will build you 150 Packages Grub, theme and plymouth (1.3 GB in size):
To install the vestige of your works:
theemahn@JackHammer:~/themes$ sudo dpkg -i *.deb (Reading
database … 603415 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing
to unpack ultimate-edition-grub-2.0_all.deb … Unpacking
ultimate-edition-grub-theme-2.0 (2.0.0) over (2.0.0) …
I do want you to understand the CPU I have is impossible to beat
at a desktop level. It cost me $811.00 just for the CPU chip. Today
much cheaper, when you step into the server world, things change. I am
not dumping $5000.00 per CPU to pound the server world.
I will
write software for it. Did you know I wrote an Operating System for the
Air Force? I am really hard to touch when it comes to security. I have
spent a large chunk of my life learning it. Feel free to tell me how I
have done. I will let you know I am about to unleash software across
the board that takes care of CPU cores. Did you know Repostorm is about
to come off the chain?
I will tell you where I am at now. Analytically will use 32 cores in my case. Will use 32 cores extracting data. When it installs software that way, they are all gone. I want to make sure you understand RepoStorm is fixing Errors 32 cores err threads at a time. Once I get installation working at a service level Repostorm will be the king, damn shame no-one else will have it. Damn shame once again I wrote it.
Yes, I am still TheeMahn,TheeMahn,
Game Over
by TheeMahn on Aug.21, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
I am years ahead of you.
Don’t worry I do not like Repostorm either, it was slow. I just
invoked it as a service, that is why I do not like it. Makes things
really slow, that is about to go away.
We can ignore this:
Fetched 8575 MB in 2min 48s (51.1 MB/s) We will continue to ignore:
RepoStorm 2.0.4 <<- “Oh, is that a 4? is pre-scanning for
error(s). Processing deb(s): 1 of 1,043 deb(s). I am about to open up
in my case 32 at a time accross the board, do not worry I am sure they
are not all errored.
To be honest, I could have it scanning for
errors 32 packages at a time. I am just dipping my toes right now. I
loved the results, hated the application. Things are about to change.
Errors detected in ./libevent-pthreads-2.1-7_2.1.11-stable-1_amd64.deb. Does not sound so stable to me.
It
is doing it one at a time. Once setup it will burn through packages 32
at a time in my case. While you may think, Glenn, damn it we do not
have a 32 core CPU. That will change.
You will look back at me and say, do you remember when I had a dual core?
I
have seen what takes over an hour to do turn into 3 minutes. This will
be much, much worse, or better if you want to look that way.
CPU
CORES rule & then you will understand. I will do the same thing to
the entire Ubuntu Repository over 50,000 packages at a time. I will use
Repostorm 2.0.3 and show you the results v/s 2.0.4. I can almost bet
you do not understand when this is dropped on a server. For an example a
256 core server.
This was single cored: Results:Error(s): 17 |
Warning(s): 732 | Info: 17Perfect deb(s): 841 Writing permanent logs for
zsh_5.8-3ubuntu1_amd64.deb.errors. RepoStorm: All operations complete.
Number of CPU Core(s) / threads(s) detected: 32. This is not
implemented: Launching 32 instances to accelerate the building
process, please wait. Extracting 32 packages of 33 at a time using 32
CPU core(s). Debugging: Current running processes: 3. I am still
“Working it” Analytical process can be done the same way.
All at once, err until I run out of chips. The ONLY thing I can’t
really do in Repostorm is install multiple packages at once. I will let
you know when I get that far or if I can or not. Every little step I
take? Eventually you will understand. Did you know what I think is
really funny I already wrote an app to do so. I swear I told you about
it, just have not released it yet. The impact is massive. Results will
be the same that I bring you.
How do you like my uethemes
application? Oh, that is write you have not seen it yet. A new
Repostorm is coming. Yes, I did deliberately spell Right Wrong.
TheeMahn,
CPU Rapeing begins.
by TheeMahn on Aug.19, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
I have been building Operating Systems Since 2006. Want to know the
most singular program that has impressed me? It is running as I type
this.
Parallel mksquashfs: Using 32 processors, at first I thought my
god leave me a Core. Everything is still smooth. I wrote an app that
utilizes the same technology. It does not stop it keeps opening threads
until you have none left and watches for one to complete, only to
launch another thread. Until the job is done. The results are
phenomenal. The fella that wrote that app had his mindset right.
I
am considering dropping the same technology into Repostorm. Why build
one deb at a time when you can build 32 at a time? But Glenn, err
TheeMahn I only have a Quad core? Results are the same. Software
acceleration.
I did tell you I would share the source code with you:
# Snatch the number of CPU Core(s) / threads the end user has.
CORES=$(grep -i "processor" "/proc/cpuinfo" | sed '/model/d' | wc -l)
(( ACTUALCORES = ${CORES} -1 ))
Encapsulate "Number of CPU Core(s) / threads(s) detected: ${CORES}"
Encapsulate "Launching ${CORES} instances to accelerate the building process, please wait."
for VERSION in {2..6};
do
for DOT in {0..9};
do
# How many core do we have running currently?
RUNNINGINSTANCES=$(ps -C uetheme | wc -l)
# EXPELL all core, let's go to work, if we have maxed out, wait for one core to finish.
while [[ "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" -ge "${CORES}" ]] ;
do
RUNNINGINSTANCES=$(ps -C uetheme | wc -l)
done
# Yee HAW we have an open core, let's put it to work.
if [[ "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" -lt "${CORES}" ]]; then
INSTANCE=$(( "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" + 1 ))
Encapsulate "Launching thread #${INSTANCE}: Populating Ultimate Edition Theme: ${VERSION}.${DOT} (RUNNING INSTANCES: ${RUNNINGINSTANCES})"
uetheme --setup ${VERSION}.${DOT} wallpaper=${VERSION}.${DOT}.png theme=${VERSION}.${DOT} --suppress & #& allows that to process and continue running through current software hence why the not equal 3 below
fi
done
done
# Wait for the cores to finish, before continuing.
while [[ "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" -ne "3" ]] ;
do
#Encapsulate "Waiting for threads to complete: ${RUNNINGINSTANCES}"
RUNNINGINSTANCES=$(ps -C uetheme | wc -l)
done
# I hate this command, but ensures all files are there before continuing.
sync;
# Import Goodies?
for VERSION in {2..6};
do
for DOT in {0..9};
do
if [[ -d "${VERSION}.${DOT}" ]]; then
Encapsulate "Build folder for ${VERSION}.${DOT} found: Importing to Ultimate Edition ${VERSION}.${DOT}/theme"
cp -T -R "${VERSION}.${DOT}/" "Ultimate Edition ${VERSION}.${DOT}/theme/ultimate-edition-theme-${VERSION}.${DOT}_all/"
fi
done
done
sync;
for VERSION in {2..6};
do
for DOT in {0..9};
do
RUNNINGINSTANCES=$(ps -C uetheme | wc -l)
while [[ "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" -ge "${CORES}" ]] ;
do
RUNNINGINSTANCES=$(ps -C uetheme | wc -l)
done
if [[ "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" -lt "${CORES}" ]]; then
INSTANCE=$(( "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" + 1 ))
Encapsulate "Launching thread #${INSTANCE}: Building Ultimate Edition Theme: ${VERSION}.${DOT} deb(s) (RUNNING INSTANCES: ${RUNNINGINSTANCES})"
uetheme --builddebs ${VERSION}.${DOT} --suppress &
fi
done
done
while [[ "${RUNNINGINSTANCES}" -ne "3" ]] ;
do
#Encapsulate "Waiting for threads to complete: ${RUNNINGINSTANCES}"
RUNNINGINSTANCES=$(ps -C uetheme | wc -l)
done
sync;
TOTALDEBS=0
for VERSION in {2..6};
do
for DOT in {0..9};
do
if [[ -d "Ultimate Edition ${VERSION}.${DOT}" ]]; then
Encapsulate "Scanning Ultimate Edition ${VERSION}.${DOT} for successful builds."
cd "Ultimate Edition ${VERSION}.${DOT}" || exit 1;
find . -name "*.deb" -type f -exec mv {} . \;
sync;
DEBS=(./*.deb)
COUNTDEBS="${#DEBS[@]}"
(( TOTALDEBS += ${COUNTDEBS} ))
Encapsulate "Found ${COUNTDEBS} perfect deb(s) in ${PWD}"
cd "${INFOLDER}" || exit 1;
fi
done
done
Timer "Stop"What does it look like in principal?
Launching thread #32: Populating Ultimate Edition Theme: 5.7 (RUNNING INSTANCES: 31)
Oh,
that is right I am writing software to make all our themes perfect
& I do mean perfect. Why not take advantage of CPU cores? I am a
CPU rapeist. I highly suggest you pay attention to the code. Cores
will only increase here going forward. They have maxed out on your GHZ,
unless you want to drop Liquid Nitrogen on your chip. I am right. Why
do you think AMD is so successful? Brought the Giant down, as soon as
software catches up, I just provided you an example above.
Do not
think Intel is now heading that way. They will make “chiplets” and
stear away from monolithic design. Even though Intel said in the past, a
stupid design by AMD. Eat it Intel. Yes, I also know 3D stacking of chips err chiplets are inbound.
You will find out I am very knowledgeable. I have a Genius IQ.
TheeMahn,
Education
by TheeMahn on Aug.15, 2020, under Ultimate Edition
Want to see how things work around here? While you may think is a
simple accomplishment. It is far from that. I built all themes took me
over an hour to do so on a 16 core / 32 Thread AMD Ryzen 3950X on
triple Raided Sabrent Rockets PCIE 4.0, capable of 16 GB a second. From
Ultimate Edition 2.0 to Ultimate Edition 6.9 theme. 170 Debian
packages, Grub, theme and Plymouth. Autonomously. I opened a can of
worms…
I opened up threads. Why one at a time if you have 32 CPU
threads? This is called Parallel processing. Taking what use to take
over an hour and turn it into 2 minutes and seven seconds? I will share
my code, do not sweat that. What happens if you only have a quad core?
it will only launch 3 instances. What if you have a 128 core / 256
thread Epyc? Would launch 256 threads, however it would run out at 170
as that is the number of debs it built. I would love to see those
results I am sure in seconds.
It is not done, just takes me much
less time to see results. I really do not understand why programmers do
not take advantage of CPU Cores. No, pun Windows is the worst.
Honesty,
Intel wants to GHZ per core on antiquated technology. All 4 of them.
The rig I have beats down even their entire server line.
Do you think Intel wins in Gaming? 9900KS, I laughed about that as a
9900 Keep Spending. I smoke their XE (which is an 18 core). I just
told you I take down the heaviest server they currently possess & I
do not have a thread ripper or an Epyc. AMD is years ahead of them.
Look at this:
Intel Xeon Gold 6248R @ 3.00GHz Cores: 24 Threads: 48 I eat it for breakfast. That is only a $3,112.03 USD
chip, makes me feel better for paying $811.00 for my chip. Today, much
less. I went though hell to get that 3950X. Sold out twice. $811.00
well spent.
Where are we today? “Big Navi” is coming, do I need to buy one? I do
not care about games. I do have dual 43″ 4K monitors, not TV’s. I can
request them to split into quad 1080p each monitor, yes 8 screens.
Like PIP (Picture In picture).
Let’s see what Ampere bring to the
table and AMD’s reaction (this would be the thing I worry about NVidia)
Want honesty? Don’t worry about that. Worry about them taking over
your datacenter. Big Navi was developed, not to win the hearts of
Gamers, but strip money from your cash cow in the server world. I will
be straight if you see one come online using HBM you are screwed. Want
me to tell you about HBN Next? You can take your GDDR6X and toss it to
the curb.
I do want you to remember, while Expensive HBM was
developed via AMD. Not a problem in the server market. Where the
charge expungement amounts of money. Let me buy a $30,000 video card, I
mean just one. Think about that. NVidia gets hit there, they are
done. We are talking Billions of dollars. I am saying AMD has them. I
am glad the upped their game to GDDR6X, too little too late. You do
know Ampere will be released before “Big Navi”? See if I am right. I
have never been wrong.
Where is that $500 market share going? It
is coming to AMD land. Do not forget AMD is about to suck up consoles.
Just in-time for the holiday. Sit at home playing on your PS5. While
I make bank & I am not a Gamer.
Most of you guys have not
listened to me. Buy, Buy, buy AMD. I got in at $6.97 a share. What is
it today? I will tell you this it is the #1 stock traversed in the
world. Weak hands selling it in millions a day & kicking them
selves in the ass. I am in for the long ride.
When I do retire, I will not hurt for money.
TheeMahn,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Ultimate Edition Re-defining the Ultimate operating system… The storm is over… by TheeMahn on Jul.01,...